Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 00:17:35 +0100
Subject: Re: a humdinger of a compromise


>Have two marxism-general lists:
>
>-- marxism-general1
>   unmoderated, anything goes, subscribers are told that they should
>   expect to get flamed to cyber-hell if they say anything, only
>   dogmatists and/or masochists need apply (but anyone can join), fire
>   insurance for PCs recommended. A willingness to tolerate Stalinoids and
>   death threats is required.
>
>-- marxism-general2
>   moderated, no cross-posting to or from other lists, flaming
>   discouraged, procedural questions to be addressed to moderators.
>   Moderators have the right to unsub someone for violation of list
>   rules. Requirement: non-membership in marxism-general1 (i.e. people
>   would have to *choose* between the two lists).
>
>An advantage of the above is that there are clear lines of demarcation
>between the two lists.
>
>Jerry

For an anarchist Jerry's got a great sense of humour.

Not just firewalls, but *padded* firewalls!

And he calls it a *compromise*!

This is the kind of compromise Margaret Thatcher would have given a can of
hairspray to have dreamed up.


Cheers,

Hugh




     --- from list marxism2-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---