Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 07:30:26 +0100
Subject: Re: M2


Jukka writes:
>On old m-list everything went crazy when one group systematically
>"terrorised" others. Long before that Louis Proyect - immediately
>after he entered the stage - propagated that 'academics' or
>'professors' should be thrown out of m-list: let they speak their
>theory mumbo-jumbo somewhere else and let's talk some real politics
>here! He got what he wanted in the form of that mao-gang which was
>'political' enough to cause first major restructuration.

Real politics indeed! 
>
>People want substantial discussion but somehow they decide to be
>silent participants here. That's a problem and something has to be
>done with it. The question is: what that would be?

Resume the serious debate. And surely we can discuss a range of issues
without 'terrorising' tactics shutting us up. I for one, will not be silenced.

>
>Because there doesn't seem to be much other discussion at the moment
>then let's talk about m2. Speak up now. What do you want? It's too
>late to cry later when changes have been made. Or is it what you're
>waiting for? To screw this second restructuration immediately its
>made?
>
>The question is: what we ought to do with this list?

I'm against a fragmentation of the list. 

>
>PS. This is strictly internal business, so no cross-f*cking-posting to
>m1. Claro? Let's clear this problem here and now without whining some
>others to help. We have to decide what to do with our shared aim to
>have some sort of theoretical discussion about marxism.
>
Yep! What do we start with? 

Russell



     --- from list marxism2-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---