Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 23:53:42 +0000
Subject: pandas 


Well of course evolution always has to work with whatever is already 
there, we do agree.  I knew the panda's thumb is not homologous with any 
phalages of other mammals, but is there some reason to expect "true 
opposability" anyway?  That is found only in a few primates.

Since I haven't read the book, could you give me a few more words on 
this, such as "so what" if the Panda's thumb is a modified wristbone?  I 
just don't see anything fundamentally earth-shattering to my [more 
or less "standard"] view of evolution, and neither does anyone else I 
know, except Terry.

Sorry it's not obvious to me what are the implications of eating 19 
hours a day, in terms of precariousness of niche [what is that?] or 
anything else.  I do tend to assume that there is probably not a better 
alternative immediately available [yes, in terms of individual fitness]. 
 
Is that type of statement an example of extreme, objectionable 
adaptationism in your opinion?  [I hope not.]

Thanks,
Lisa


     --- from list marxism2-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---