Date: 28 May 1996 13:08:13 EST
Subject: LAMENT FROM THE PEANUT GALLERY
Not to rain on the pomo-bashers' picnic, but one unfortunate
effect of the Sokal hoax has been that it inadvertantly rewards
intellectual laziness. Or rather, it has meant that people who
don't know anything at all about "theory" except that they don't
like it can be all smug and pleased with themselves. Now, I
liked Sokal's article very much, and nothing could amuse me more
than seeing Andrew Ross and Stanley Aronowitz trying to wiggle
their way out of this one. But seriously -- to arrange Gilles
Deleuze, Louis Althusser, Fredric Jameson, and twenty other names
under the product-label "postmodernism" (or whatever), and then
to dismiss them all on the grounds that SOCIAL TEXTers can't pour
piss from a boot with instructions printed on the heel; what is
this but utter nonsense?
It has been a long time since I paid much attention to the
doings in humanities departments, except insofar as I have to
report on it now and then for magazines. (Lately, for instance,
I'm spending all my free time reading Boswell's LIFE OF JOHNSON,
a less trendy book you couldn't ask for). And in the same issue
of LINGUA FRANCA as the Sokal expose, there is a little piece,
very critical indeed, about Jean Baudrillard's exceptionally
silly booklet on the Gulf War; prepared for that journal by your
humble servant. In brief, my bullshit detector works as well as
most (and it is sensitive enough to go off the minute I log on
here). But as much crap as gets published by the trend-monkeys
in the academic world, no less of it is issued by know-nothings
outside the university. Sad but true.
Remember Sturgeon's Law: ninety percent of everything is
crap. Easy to say; the challenge consists in remembering that it
applies even to things you like. And there are seasons during
which Sturgeon sounds like an optimist.
Scott McLemee mclemee-AT-mail.loc.gov
--- from list marxism2-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005