Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 08:07:30 -0500
Subject: Re: M-G: Re: M-I: The more things change ....


Hugh Rodwell wrote:
> 
> >>As November slides into December, the new lists are slowly becoming every
> >>bit as real and contradictory as the old ones.
> >
> >Hey man, lighten the fuck up! (and everyone else who's been so damn snooty
> >about who's on this list- you elitist bastards!)  If you don't like it,
> >don't read it (I unfortunatley have to throw away a good bit of mail
> >unopened, due to time; sorry that I don't have the time you have found to
> >participate to the fullest in every little discussion)
> >
> >And if you're so concerned about the ability of the working class to carry
> >out THEIR revolution, why don't you let a few lesser thans hang out here,
> >listen to your enlightened diatribe, and get a clue?
> >
> >!
> >sterling
> >Austin
> 
> Wasn't M-G supposed to be the place for this kind of thing? You know,
> contributions starting from the idea that some people belong on a list and
> some don't?
> 
> Seems fate has decided otherwise.
> 

Too bad if it's true. Does it mean we are not going to have a new revolutionary
leadership by Chrismas? Or a new revolutionary theory, at least?  Will sectarians
continue on their devilish course instead of being unmasked and destroyed by 
the Bolsheviks of our time armed with Foucault, British Encyclopedia, and 
*common sense*?  Too bad if it's true.

Vladimir


     --- from list marxism-general-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---