Subject: presentation, representation
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 05:08:46 +0900


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.


 hello!

my question is a simpler and abstrct than other ones, i.e, what is different presentation with representation in lyotard's philosophical system?

when i had read his <differend>, i thought he used the kantian terms. but he distinctively differentiated  the using of two terms in his recent article. i think, he defined the contemporary art as " presenting the unpresentable"(it is also his essay title),  so at here the question rised. what is the interrelationship with this 3 different concept : presentation, representation, the unpresentable?

and what is the character of sublime as presenting the unpresentable? finally, is it same conception the kant's sublime with lyotard's sublime?

would you tell me a solution for this problem?



    

HTML VERSION:

 hello!

my question is a simpler and abstrct than other ones, i.e, what is different presentation with representation in lyotard's philosophical system? 

when i had read his <differend>, i thought he used the kantian terms. but he distinctively differentiated  the using of two terms in his recent article. i think, he defined the contemporary art as " presenting the unpresentable"(it is also his essay title),  so at here the question rised. what is the interrelationship with this 3 different concept : presentation, representation, the unpresentable?

and what is the character of sublime as presenting the unpresentable? finally, is it same conception the kant's sublime with lyotard's sublime?

would you tell me a solution for this problem?