Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 10:29:20 -0800 Subject: Re: Procedure William McClure wrote: > > To Eric, > > It is a shame, I admit, that your original post did not generate more > interest. I wouldn't give up too quickly however. It provides an > intersting supplement to everything else to have a more sustained and > in depth discussion of a text. People can just come and go as they > please and the posts can be marked by long silences. (The rules, I > think, will have to be set as we go along - not beforehand.) I think > that is going to be the nature of this beast. The turbine will no doubt > keep generating thoughts that feed in and pick up on what is being dealt > with elsewhere in an ongoing discussion of "Levinas' Logic". > > I am quite happy to let people sit with the text for as long as is > required before they get the urge to put down some thoughts in writing. > WM -AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT--AT- William, Eric, and others, Lately I found an expression to the effect that: "People care about things they don't understand", and "People understand things they don't care about." There is a chance of learning more about present interests as well as discovering new interests. And each List develops its own tone and etiquette. Not to worry! Hugh
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005