Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:56:59 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: Topic



Modernism is not a cohesive movement as you know.  Eliot was conservative in politics, revolutionary in aesthetics, given the context of the Georgian poetry that preceded him.  Pound was in many ways, an Edwardian and inherited much from Browning and Clough.  Lawrence, Yeats, Joyce and Beckett were all on the fringes, or only partly subsumed by Modernism.  I'll write later, I'm  off to see 'The Pianist', ciao, PM
>  from:    Jason Stuart <jts0803odon-AT-yahoo.com>
>  date:    Sat, 08 Mar 2003 16:32:57
>  to:      heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>  subject: Re: Topic
> 
> 
>  
>  Paul Murphy <Villanova-AT-btopenworld.com> wrote:Russian Futurism, Modernism in UK, Ireland, Western Europe, Italian Futurismconcomitant political movements See my last message.  What are you saying about Modernism--that it isn't concerned with form and content?  Or that it contributed to the death of the avant-garde?   If you're getting this from a particular text, please cite it so I can better understand what you're thinking-- JS
> 
> 
> !-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!
> 
>  "...even if he recopied them later, as I suspect he sometimes did, he marked his card or cards not with the date of his final adjustments, but with that of his Corrected Draft or first Fair Copy. I mean, he preserved the date of actual creation rather than that of second or third thoughts. There is a very loud amusement park right in front of my present lodgings."
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more


Paul Murphy
Tel: 0044 02890 659866
Fax: 0044 02890 322767



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---