Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 05:31:00 +0000
Subject: Re: the o/o gulf


> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

--MS_Mac_OE_3131501464_233698_MIME_Part

allen's wel-coming return said:

> ... seeming 
> to will not to "take sides."  Someone else argued that in itself was
> taking sides.  But who gets to de-cide what the sides even are?  Is
> there not an undiscovered place in-side (and outside) all the sides?
> A place to forcefully commit one's thinking to the o.d.( perhaps
> without the distraction of the televised images of "truth" Michael E.
> alludes to)?

an aside, briefly for now: yes, where in the world do sides come from? a Big
(mother of all) Side(s)? (one, say of the godded gods, the History of
hysterical materialisms, The Market, etc); or the grand sum total of all
sides (The Polyhedron of All-Sidedness Incarnate?, sometimes serially worked
out in the marketing of the market and such); the Actual Sidedness of the
Cosmogonal Essence Itself? (the world as ushered in in its arche as always
already sided, a frictioning of frictions, big-banging on for ever...
polemos endless {a song kraftwerk might have waxed :-)}), etc. All these and
more boil down to just other sides however all-embracing or totalising or
convincing...

the real gulf perhaps is the utter peace, the haven'd site of the
difference/differing of the no-sided a-hedral siding of sides, the dreaded
"o.d."?

love is the drug

michaelP(can't sleep)


--MS_Mac_OE_3131501464_233698_MIME_Part

HTML VERSION:

> ... seeming
> to will not to "take sides."  Someone else argued that in itself was
> taking sides.  But who gets to de-cide what the sides even are?  Is
> there not an undiscovered place in-side (and outside) all the sides?
> A place to forcefully commit one's thinking to the o.d.( perhaps
> without the distraction of the televised images of "truth" Michael E.
> alludes to)?