Subject: Re: ontical history
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:07:08 +0000


Paul Murphy wrote:

>sarcasm is the lowest form of wit

But brevity is its soul.

>Hitler - again, you look at history through rose-tinted bourgeois
>spectacles.
>You don't make historical, objective points, but subjective, emotional 
>ones.

Oh please paul, your primitive 19th century philosophical distinctions 
(bourgeois, objective, subjective, etc.) are so philosophically outdated 
that you might as well start shouting for the workers of the world to unite. 
You don't even know phenomenologies such as that of Husserl, Heidegger, and 
Levinas well enough to recognize that the philosophy you are so obviously 
assuming has been transcended many times over by 20th century phenomenology. 
So get off your proletariat high horse and step into the 20th century, 
before you stiffen into a frozen relic of 19th century historical 
materialism forever. Marxists think they are so the be-all and end-all of 
philosophy, and all the while, phenomenologists are reaching new heights of 
which Marx never imagined.

Anthony Crifasi

>You want to make people sentimentalise about events.  I mean, you can't
>possibly say that, can you, what about the N****.    Please, no sentiment,
>no phoney bourgeois 'legalism', I don't need it.

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---