File spoon-archives/heidegger.archive/heidegger_2003/heidegger.0303, message 15


Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:45:38 +0000
Subject: Re: Time is temporal!


> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

--MS_Mac_OE_3129565541_1859481_MIME_Part

Allen in recent times said:

> Die Zeit ist Zeitlich!   Heidegger claims on p.21 of "The Concept of
> Time" ( lecture to the Marburg Theologians in 1924) that this is not
> a tautology, but rather" the most authentic determination. . .because
> the Being of temporality signifies non-identical actuality" (wiel das
> Sein der Zeitlichkeit ungleiche Wirklichkeit bedeutet).

[snip]

> I need some help in parsing the movement of the language here.
> 
> Allen (needful of, and perhaps even desiring  correction)

Allen, no correction needed, methinks... this seems to be somethink [sic]
Hegelian... time (temporality) is precisely and utterly punctually, the
non-identical, is never what it is. Heidegger in saying that time is
temporal and that is not a tautology, is saying that time times and is
neverever self-identical (and that is the being of time and the time of
being), time is timing (and moving on as the stones who gather no moss say).
If we can say that time is change(ing) then, then now and the to-come are
gathered in non-identity: the very ontological difference... the -ing in
be-ing, time in its timing. What do you think?

regards

michaelP


--MS_Mac_OE_3129565541_1859481_MIME_Part

HTML VERSION:

Re: Time is temporal! Allen in recent times said:

> Die Zeit ist Zeitlich!   Heidegger claims on p.21 of "The Concept of
> Time" ( lecture to the Marburg Theologians in 1924) that this is not
> a tautology, but rather" the most authentic determination. . .because
> the Being of temporality signifies non-identical actuality" (wiel das
> Sein der Zeitlichkeit ungleiche Wirklichkeit bedeutet).

[snip]

> I need some help in parsing the movement of the language here.
>
> Allen (needful of, and perhaps even desiring  correction)

Allen, no correction needed, methinks... this seems to be somethink [sic] Hegelian... time (temporality) is precisely and utterly punctually, the non-identical, is never what it is. Heidegger in saying that time is temporal and that is not a tautology, is saying that time times and is neverever self-identical (and that is the being of time and the time of being), time is timing (and moving on as the stones who gather no moss say). If we can say that time is change(ing) then, then now and the to-come are gathered in non-identity: the very ontological difference... the -ing in be-ing, time in its timing. What do you think?

regards

michaelP
--MS_Mac_OE_3129565541_1859481_MIME_Part-- --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005