Subject: Re: tudoric druidisticisms
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 04:44:37 +0000


Kenneth Johnson wrote:

>seems
>
>may be, our scantlized tudoress has receded into
>
>his supra
>
>stition, the site of his "gathering", lottsa a.gog babes there no doubt
>
>n wil/now leave the real to the real real [sans anthony o'course]

sans limited knowledge in certain areas, o'course

>nstead of the imaginary real
>
>as e, girded by 'is ['er really] symbolic reeling drunkenness, fornicating
>w/ his own two doored brain, thrusting it shallow breathed up on atop n
>deep unended, into, "The Word"
>
>well, no doubt, "there is" [light, and 'there is' (no thing but} language]
>still, there is still a future there
>
>where we're, as us, i.e. us "grounded ones", are all still sickened,
>afflicted, like orestes,
>
>u no    ?
>
>no?
>
>tomorrow, yes, tomorrow, yes, i may de.side, to sober down a bit
>
>and tell the truth about the truth
>
>or its other, but
>
>other
>
>wise i will
>
>b life being, n rage rage rage rage, raging against
>
>  the living anthoniakian/tudorik/lemminik

You can't overcome rage with limited knowledge, K. Time to commit the worse 
sin of all - to humble yourself and learn a little to get rid of those 
bothersome limitations. Then see if rage remains.

Anthony Crifasi

>nothingness, its ignore-ant love thereof, tho cloaked other-wise



_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



     --- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---