Subject: Blue skies
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 10:33:03 PST
If someone said, "Look up, the sky is blue", and you smiled in
agreement, and then later, when this same person was revealed to be an
old Nazi spy, would you look up suddenly to the sky in disbelief?
Or is this debate an instance of 'interpretation', whereas the blueness
of sky is not contested, but interpretations of Hiedegger's texts are in
dispute and so it matters. One side saying Hiedegger's writings are, the
other that they are not, to be judged according to expediencies in the
'realpolitik' of the Worlding Games.
For those few in every age who come solidly up against the wall of the
not yet revealed, and who know 'who' (or rather 'what') they are,
bearers of a new perspective with force strong enough to change all old
perceptions towards the higher, they are of necessity a bit paranoid.
Their feeling is one of knowing the fanciful nature of human mortality,
and unmorbidly feel that what they have seen is important enough to
future to feel uneasy that their relating of this vision might be
mortally cut short. Expediency and caution concerning activities in 'the
real world', the social, are seen by them as necessary to proactively
counter at times. I think this particular feeling is also part of
Clinton's dilemma, as his faulty judgement resulting from personal
passion threatens the good he feels he uniquely has the power yet to
give to the Worlding games. He re-acted 'expediently' for what he
perceived as the higher good.
In terms of genre, isn't this the difference between those who think
Hiedegger or Clinton did what they themselves would have done in the
same situation, in order to survive the penalties meted by the regimes
of 'truth', over a matter they felt did not threaten this regime
personally (since, in Clinton's case at least, it is unlikely their
regimental daughters are more vulnerable to Clinton than to the boy down
the street), versus those who are 'convicted' that their regime of truth
is the only thing that stands between them and the barbaric?
I realize these remarks are simplistic and flawed, but still a gram
inheres.
Billy
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005