Subject: Re: As usual
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 01:31:13 -0500
Cologne 26 January 1999
Rene de Bakker schrieb:
>> >ultimately, of course, heid and b&t are somehow
>> >a product, a "thrown-ness," of these same
>> >material historical determinants.
>> >leaving one less of a problem with his fascism
>> >than his personal (especially husserl, eh) betrayals.
>> >his failure to make good on them accounts.
>>
>>
>> Now, from where are you talking now?
>
>Bob's talking from on high.
michael
you're right of course,
...in the ironic sense you mean it, that is.
no specialist
...the homely voice of the chorus, i'd guess.
i have a farmer uncle who's scornfull of my understanding
for lack of having plowed, planted and harvested.
i have an economist brother tells me i know nothing for
not knowing fiscal, macro, money supply, whatever...
a cousin judge insists, never having laid down the law,
i can't possibly know anything worth his listening
...you get my drift.
each has a speciality he inflates
to fit his narcissism and labels "truth"
your idea is to multiply stilted verbal formulations
among a rare few fellow specialists...ugh
well that's ok with me, i guess;
but you might concede at parting,
this makes a pretty good fit
with the frankfurter notion of
the bourgeois brahmin caste,
brewing the final mystification (dasein-verbum)...of capital
bob
--- from list heidegger-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005