Subject: Re: [HAB:] re: Getting ethical by getting highly self-identical
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:26:19 +0100


So I shouldn't have responded to Fred, and shouldn't have
expected him to respond to me on-list rather than take me
(respond to me) off-line.  

Sue McPherson

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <FREDWELFARE-AT-aol.com>
To: <habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [HAB:] re: Getting ethical by getting highly self-identical


> 
> In a message dated 8/22/2004 4:44:51 AM Eastern Standard Time,  
> sue-AT-mcphersons.freeserve.co.uk writes:
> 
> And so,  does one have to be an expert in knowldge of all aspects
> of all his  theories or can one chip in with what one does know,
> however that relates  to what is being discussed?
> 
> If a person wants others to develop  understanding of a topic as 
> complex as Habermas's theories, how would be  the best way of
> going about it.  Habermas has strong ideas about this,  wouldn't 
> you say?
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Sue,
> Everyone who wants to should 'chip in' with anything that might be helpful  
> and this includes opinions, not simply knowledge, if you accept the  
> distinction.  The list is specifically for this reason: to include  everyone.  Some 
> people are very well-read and this needs to be balanced  with views from those who 
> consider applying these ideas without necessarily  having read the oeuvre.  
>  
> The best way of going about developing an understanding Habermas is to read  
> a bit of his work and then to ask questions.
>  
> Fred
> 
> 
> --- StripMime Warning --  MIME attachments removed --- 
> This message may have contained attachments which were removed.
> 
> Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list.
> 
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- 
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
> 
> 
>      --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


     --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---