Subject: Re: HAB: A non-intersubjective Other?
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 19:08:57 PDT


Dear Ken & List,

thanks for the clarification. My reading of your initial post was shaped (as 
often happens!) by my prejudices/favoured reading of Habermas.

>The same kind of analysis applies to communication... ??

It seems a fair proposal given Habermas's uptake of Mead.

Matthew Piscioneri
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com



     --- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---