Subject: Re: HAB: #2: Autonomy as dogma
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 13:22:22 GMT
Dear Antti,
thanks for the ramble :-) I can assure you that all information is useful to
this struggling student of Habermas!
Your musings here are particularly interesting...
>The Kantian strategy is to argue that we cannot prove that we
>are free (and so autonomous), but all the while we cannot help
>conceiving ourselves as such.
Given many layperson's critical existential attitude has - I would argue -
both a self-preservationist premise AND the dogma of autonomy at the core of
their understanding of the world; what chance has a program of critical
reform which seeks to draw its normativity from sources OTHER than these
(illusory or not)?
Just an antipodean pre-bedtime thought on a wet July night.
Best Regards,
MattP
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
--- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005