Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 15:16:20 -0500
Subject: Re: HAB: Putting it to a Vote
On Fri, 6 Mar 1998 19:29:34 -0500 Antti Kauppinen wrote:
> In a wide sense, a performative contradiction is saying one
thing and doing the opposite. In a more restricted sense, it is
saying one thing and *thereby* doing the opposite. Ken's
charge is that criticizing someone for this is incoherent, a
logical circle, at least when Habermas does it. Now,
> >1. How many people think it is a coherent and rational
charge?
> We'll find out next week.
Aggghghggh. No no no. I'm simply pointing out that when
Habermas argues that an argument is a performative
contradiciton Habermas also commits a performative
contradiction. It just doesn't move things along in a helpful
way.
ken
--- from list habermas-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005