Subject: Re: AUT: Fascism
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:42:16 +1100 (EST)


Quoting commie00 <commie00-AT-yahoo.com>:

> > After all, even
> > commie00 would agree, I think, that a mass petty bourgeoisie existed
> in
> > Germany and Italy in the 1920's and 1930's.
> 
> i would. =P   and further, i've often wondered if fascism wasn't, at
> least
> in part, a response of the begining of mass proletarianization.

So England circa 1830 was full of fascists? 

 
> that is: the pb was defined, in part, by a desire to be
> grande-bourgeois...
> and fascism may represent their last ditch effort to integrate
> themselves
> into the ruling class.

This doesn't really explain why fascists tended to distance themselves 
from the Grande in grande-bourgeois... or the jewish element...

> 
> interestingly, i suspect that fascism is one of the reasons the pb was
> eventually destroyed as a class (some being brought into the
> bourgeoisie,
> and the rest being proletarianized)... that is: to destroy their
> inverse
> threat to capitalism, etc.

The petite-bourgeiosie is dead? What the fuck? This country at least, is 
swarming with little shop owners with grade-A pb attidue.


> 
> and, as dauve has noted, the strengthening of bourgeois democracy 
was
> another result.
> 
> this is all just speculation, tho.
> 
 
You can say that again! Actually, please don't.

> 
> 
>      --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> 



-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: www-mail.usyd.edu.au


     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---