Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:49:38 -0500
Subject: Re: AUT: Marxist explanations of sexual violence



This book is available from Autonomedia:

Arcane of Reproduction
Housework, Prostitution, Labor and Capital
Leopoldina Fortunati

US$10.00



In Stock
  Quantity 


ISBN 0-936756-14-4    |   Pub. Date: 1995 
176 Pages  |  6" x 9"  |   Paper Perfectbound
Autonomedia

One of Italy's leading feminist thinkers critiques traditional 
Marxist categories and examines their effects on the capitalist 
"reproductive" roles of women's labor and bodies in which the 
individual is redefined in pure terms of use value.

http://bookstore.autonomedia.org





>Hi autopsy and revo-readers,
>
>Does anyone know of any work by Marxists on sexual
>violence (that's the general term the experts use to
>cover everything from rape to incest to harassment at
>work)?
>
>I have been helping someone employed by a sexual
>health group do some research and formulate some
>viewpoints on this issue. For me, it is essential to
>take a broad and materialist view of this issue - to
>transcend the narrow empiricism - the uncontextualised
>statistics and reproduction of faddish homilies -
>which compromise much of the work I have seen.
>
>The leap from analyses of the likes of unpaid domestic
>labour and women's role in the reserve army of labour
>to explanations of actual sexual violence is a great
>one. I have been trying (proabaly ineptly) to make it
>by focusing on ideology - that is, on the ideological
>reproduction of women's economic place in capitalism
>via the operation of empiricism/commodity fetishism. I
>figure that the presence of sexist ideology - which,
>of course, comes in many forms, from Baptism to
>political correctness to ostensibly liberatory guides
>to being a 'superwoman' - is a necessary condition for
>acts of sexual violence, and that credible claims can
>thus be made about a 'material base' for sexual
>violence in capitalist society.
>
>If the base often makes itself felt indirectly,
>through the agency of ideology, it may also make
>itself felt directly, by ensuring an environment that
>encourages such violence (the 'privacy' of the
>family-as-economic-unit and the economic dependence of
>many women on men are cases in point here).
>
>Does anyone have any thoughts, references?
>
>Cheers
>Scott
>
>====>"Revolution is not like cricket, not even one day cricket"
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
>http://uk.my.yahoo.com
>
>
>      --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


-- 
Jim-AT-autonomedia.org
http://www.autonomedia.org

HTML VERSION:

Hi autopsy and revo-readers,

Does anyone know of any work by Marxists on sexual
violence (that's the general term the experts use to
cover everything from rape to incest to harassment at
work)?

I have been helping someone employed by a sexual
health group do some research and formulate some
viewpoints on this issue. For me, it is essential to
take a broad and materialist view of this issue - to
transcend the narrow empiricism - the uncontextualised
statistics and reproduction of faddish homilies -
which compromise much of the work I have seen.

The leap from analyses of the likes of unpaid domestic
labour and women's role in the reserve army of labour
to explanations of actual sexual violence is a great
one. I have been trying (proabaly ineptly) to make it
by focusing on ideology - that is, on the ideological
reproduction of women's economic place in capitalism
via the operation of empiricism/commodity fetishism. I
figure that the presence of sexist ideology - which,
of course, comes in many forms, from Baptism to
political correctness to ostensibly liberatory guides
to being a 'superwoman' - is a necessary condition for
acts of sexual violence, and that credible claims can
thus be made about a 'material base' for sexual
violence in capitalist society.

If the base often makes itself felt indirectly,
through the agency of ideology, it may also make
itself felt directly, by ensuring an environment that
encourages such violence (the 'privacy' of the
family-as-economic-unit and the economic dependence of
many women on men are cases in point here).

Does anyone have any thoughts, references?

Cheers
Scott

=====
"Revolution is not like cricket, not even one day cricket"

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com


     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

--