Subject: Re: The Co-optation of Feminism
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 14:51:23 PDT
><< Gee, most of the "self described" feminists I know would not fit >your
>definition, because they want much more than equality. But what >the hell
>is this talk about meeting a required definition? Did you >set up these
>requirements? Where can I take the test? >>
>aren't all "feminists" self described? i mean your right there is no >set
>definition of feminism. Mattel could call barbie a feminist if they
>wanted...does that mean she's a feminist?
Man, I really need to stop these attempts at humor. The "self described"
thing was just a reference to how all anarchists have lately been labeled in
the media as "self described" or simply "anarchists." I was actually
responding to the fact that these particular feminists would not fit Neuro's
own officially licensed (tm) definition of feminism, contrary to my
intuition.
Kevin K.
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005