Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:29:49 -0500 To: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] "new" rules for the CPSIA legislation That would be manageable. I still think it is unfair to small toy makers. Do you know when the law take effect? On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Michael Dowell <moodooguru-AT-gmail.com> wrote: > Hobey, > > Here is the ballpark pricing I gathered from the lab I contacted. > > The tests you might need for Peepers might be very different from the > tests required for plush toys. > > $75 each different material is a different component -- lead in > substrates - the article itself (or what is under the coating) > $70 per coating (for example if it's a button (or a glossy plastic > toy) it will have a coating) > $245 physical mechanical torque & tension ASTM F963 > $70 flammability per toy > $85 doll's clothing > $?? forgot to ask the price of the test for pthalates. Since peepers > are plastic, you would probably have to test for this. > > Michael > > On Dec 16, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Hobey Ford wrote: > >> I heard this on the news the day the law passed. I will certainly be >> writing some letters. If this goes through I wonder what the range of >> cost it will be to have products tested? >> >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Lucky Stradley <lrc-AT-gpcom.net> wrote: >>> I am forwarding portions of emails that I have received pertaining >>> to the >>> new legislation that might effect those of us who build products >>> that can be >>> played with by person less than 14 years of age. I do not pretend >>> to know >>> much about this issue. But there are others that seem to think >>> that we need >>> to take a closer look at this. >>> >>> Here is are the excerpts: >>> " I posted a comment re: toy regulation on the petition site. I was >>> wondering >>>> if the new regulation law was to address imported toys only or was a >>>> blanket >>>> law covering everyone and the kitchen sink including small >>>> businesses >>>> here >>>> that produce safe soft toys for children? >>>> >>>> Anyways, About.com has some info on this area as the department of >>>> consumer >>>> protection visited Toy Fair this year. >>>> >>>> http://collectdolls.about.com/od/dollsattoyfair2006/tp/ >>>> toyfair2008trends.htm" >>> >>> The response: >>> "it applies to everyone. That's the terrible part of it. As it >>> is written now there are absolutely no exceptions and it's up to the >>> manufacturer to do the testing (ie...it doesn't matter if the >>> materials one uses were tested beforehand). >>> >>> So not only does it put people making art dolls/bears/etc on thin ice >>> but it will completely shut down all the cottage industries where >>> people are making Waldorf/Steiner dolls, childrens clothing, >>> hand-carved wooden toys, etc. >>> >>> In addition to how it affects small businesses there are responsible >>> overseas manufacturers who have already stated they intend to stop >>> selling to the US after this goes into effect. I chatted with the >>> owner of my ex-workplace, which is now largely a high-end toy store, >>> and she says they will no longer be able to stock a good portion of >>> what they have now and all children's items, across the board (all >>> stores, not just there) will go up by at least 20% in price. >>> >>> She was able to explain things to me a bit better. As it turns out, >>> all the US had to do was to match the already very strict European >>> guidelines and everything would have been fine. But instead the US >>> apparently had to 'one up' everyone and go completely overboard >>> creating a situation that not only will shut down thousands of little >>> cottage industries but result in large scale layoffs from the retail >>> through distributor and manufacturing levels. >>> >>> Anyway, if people are concerned I encourage them to write to their >>> reps, even if it's just via the form letter that's been offered here >>> before. Petitions are all but useless as far as getting a message to >>> the people who can make changes; written ones are typically >>> roundfiled >>> and electronic ones ignored. If you are concerned, please write!" >>> >>> Another: >>> "I just wanted to let you know what my product manager for our doll >>> manufacturer responded to my question about the age situation for >>> selling >>> our >>> new 7" jointed "Kinder Kid" dolls. >>> >>> Below is his answer to my question. I asked about the "age 12 and >>> above"...but he said...well, you can read it. >>> I plan on following up on this and having them put all the necessary >>> information on our packaging and doing some research on an >>> "independent >>> safety >>> test lab". >>> I found the second paragraph quite interesting. Seems the government >>> doesn't >>> even know what's what....Duh! Same old same old!" >>> >>> Reply: >>> "According to the US ASTM F963 toy safety standard, the definition >>> of toys >>> is >>> any plaything designed, manufactured or marketed for children >>> under 14 years >>> of age. Therefore, your "Kinder Kids" should be marketed for ages >>> 14 and >>> above in order to classify them as 'collectible doll' for adults. >>> We suggest >>> you to add the warning printing on the packaging, like "Choking >>> Hazard: Not >>> suitable for children under 14 years". The information of the >>> distributor >>> (your company) and country of origin should be included on the >>> packaging, >>> too, >>> to fulfill the law in US. >>> >>> Since there is still a lot of things regarding the Consumer >>> Product Safety >>> Improvement Act not being declared/explained clearly yet, we would >>> suggest >>> you >>> to contact the independent safety test lab there to clarify your >>> responsibility if any." >>> >>> So have any one on pupcrit heard anything about all this? >>> >>> Lucky Stradley >>> Hubbell, Nebraska >>> >>> lrc-AT-gpcom.net >>> >>> http://luckystradley.blogspot.com/ >>> ~~last update 11/2/2008~~ >>> >>> http://www.picturetrail.com/13luckyme >>> ~~picture trail last updated 6/9/2006~~ >>> >>> http://community.webshots.com/user/beenlucky >>> I am trying this site out for listing pictures. >>> ~~last update 7/13/2006~~ >>> >>> Always Lucky...well most of the time! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org >>> Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit >>> Archives: http://www.driftline.org >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org >> Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit >> Archives: http://www.driftline.org > > _______________________________________________ > List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org > Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit > Archives: http://www.driftline.org > _______________________________________________ List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit Archives: http://www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005