Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:17:35 -0800 To: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] "new" rules for the CPSIA legislation Hobey, Here is the ballpark pricing I gathered from the lab I contacted. The tests you might need for Peepers might be very different from the tests required for plush toys. $75 each different material is a different component -- lead in substrates - the article itself (or what is under the coating) $70 per coating (for example if it's a button (or a glossy plastic toy) it will have a coating) $245 physical mechanical torque & tension ASTM F963 $70 flammability per toy $85 doll's clothing $?? forgot to ask the price of the test for pthalates. Since peepers are plastic, you would probably have to test for this. Michael On Dec 16, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Hobey Ford wrote: > I heard this on the news the day the law passed. I will certainly be > writing some letters. If this goes through I wonder what the range of > cost it will be to have products tested? > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Lucky Stradley <lrc-AT-gpcom.net> wrote: >> I am forwarding portions of emails that I have received pertaining >> to the >> new legislation that might effect those of us who build products >> that can be >> played with by person less than 14 years of age. I do not pretend >> to know >> much about this issue. But there are others that seem to think >> that we need >> to take a closer look at this. >> >> Here is are the excerpts: >> " I posted a comment re: toy regulation on the petition site. I was >> wondering >>> if the new regulation law was to address imported toys only or was a >>> blanket >>> law covering everyone and the kitchen sink including small >>> businesses >>> here >>> that produce safe soft toys for children? >>> >>> Anyways, About.com has some info on this area as the department of >>> consumer >>> protection visited Toy Fair this year. >>> >>> http://collectdolls.about.com/od/dollsattoyfair2006/tp/ >>> toyfair2008trends.htm" >> >> The response: >> "it applies to everyone. That's the terrible part of it. As it >> is written now there are absolutely no exceptions and it's up to the >> manufacturer to do the testing (ie...it doesn't matter if the >> materials one uses were tested beforehand). >> >> So not only does it put people making art dolls/bears/etc on thin ice >> but it will completely shut down all the cottage industries where >> people are making Waldorf/Steiner dolls, childrens clothing, >> hand-carved wooden toys, etc. >> >> In addition to how it affects small businesses there are responsible >> overseas manufacturers who have already stated they intend to stop >> selling to the US after this goes into effect. I chatted with the >> owner of my ex-workplace, which is now largely a high-end toy store, >> and she says they will no longer be able to stock a good portion of >> what they have now and all children's items, across the board (all >> stores, not just there) will go up by at least 20% in price. >> >> She was able to explain things to me a bit better. As it turns out, >> all the US had to do was to match the already very strict European >> guidelines and everything would have been fine. But instead the US >> apparently had to 'one up' everyone and go completely overboard >> creating a situation that not only will shut down thousands of little >> cottage industries but result in large scale layoffs from the retail >> through distributor and manufacturing levels. >> >> Anyway, if people are concerned I encourage them to write to their >> reps, even if it's just via the form letter that's been offered here >> before. Petitions are all but useless as far as getting a message to >> the people who can make changes; written ones are typically >> roundfiled >> and electronic ones ignored. If you are concerned, please write!" >> >> Another: >> "I just wanted to let you know what my product manager for our doll >> manufacturer responded to my question about the age situation for >> selling >> our >> new 7" jointed "Kinder Kid" dolls. >> >> Below is his answer to my question. I asked about the "age 12 and >> above"...but he said...well, you can read it. >> I plan on following up on this and having them put all the necessary >> information on our packaging and doing some research on an >> "independent >> safety >> test lab". >> I found the second paragraph quite interesting. Seems the government >> doesn't >> even know what's what....Duh! Same old same old!" >> >> Reply: >> "According to the US ASTM F963 toy safety standard, the definition >> of toys >> is >> any plaything designed, manufactured or marketed for children >> under 14 years >> of age. Therefore, your "Kinder Kids" should be marketed for ages >> 14 and >> above in order to classify them as 'collectible doll' for adults. >> We suggest >> you to add the warning printing on the packaging, like "Choking >> Hazard: Not >> suitable for children under 14 years". The information of the >> distributor >> (your company) and country of origin should be included on the >> packaging, >> too, >> to fulfill the law in US. >> >> Since there is still a lot of things regarding the Consumer >> Product Safety >> Improvement Act not being declared/explained clearly yet, we would >> suggest >> you >> to contact the independent safety test lab there to clarify your >> responsibility if any." >> >> So have any one on pupcrit heard anything about all this? >> >> Lucky Stradley >> Hubbell, Nebraska >> >> lrc-AT-gpcom.net >> >> http://luckystradley.blogspot.com/ >> ~~last update 11/2/2008~~ >> >> http://www.picturetrail.com/13luckyme >> ~~picture trail last updated 6/9/2006~~ >> >> http://community.webshots.com/user/beenlucky >> I am trying this site out for listing pictures. >> ~~last update 7/13/2006~~ >> >> Always Lucky...well most of the time! >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org >> Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit >> Archives: http://www.driftline.org >> > _______________________________________________ > List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org > Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit > Archives: http://www.driftline.org _______________________________________________ List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit Archives: http://www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005