Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:14:21 -0600 To: puptcrit-AT-lists.driftline.org Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] Wikipedia puppetry entries On Jan 23, 2006, at 2:37 PM, Steve Axtell wrote: > That really is bad. How could one make such a > statement? That's like saying "People have > blonde hair and green eyes, and always vote." > I find it curious to think that anyone who works in theatre/puppetry might imagine there is some ultimate authority who can define things ultimately and for everyone else. I personally love Bread & Puppet's work. I also love much of what Henson did, as I have noted on this forum. I have visited Axtell Expressions, Inc. web site, seen the catalogue and recommended Axtell products to many people. I think it is a wonderful business. I also realize that in designing a puppet the choice of "cute" is picked for specific reasons. I've not seen a Bread & Puppet work that employs much "cute". But "cuteness" has a lot of currency in the world of advertising and entertainment, where "sacred" has very limited currency. I respect Mr. Axtell's and Mr. Shumann's respective opinions and each of their rights and responsibilities to recreate, rethink and re-invent their approach to puppetry. The art is as diverse as the artists. That is a very good thing. Argument and discussion can lead to expanded understanding, clarification, cross fertilization, vitality, artistic growth, etc. All good things. Depth & width expand. Children's toys made to look like cute animals is a pretty recent practice in human culture. Sacred effigies are quite a bit more ancient. My own personal understanding is that when we tell stories for the ancient & traditional purposes, we are engaged in a sacred activity. But the more we tell stories for commercial purposes - that is, using storytelling to sell something to others - we have crossed over to the profane (at worst) & trivial (at best). It took me over 20 years of work & study to come to this understanding. And I have applied my own creative work to both the sacred & the profane. So if I am casting stones, it is not from a sinless posture. Someone, Bertolt Brecht perhaps, said, "Art is not a mirror. Art is a hammer". Abraham Maslow said "When your only tool is a hammer, you tend to treat everything like a nail" I won't venture what might happen when your favorite tool is "cute". mjm "Do not impose on others what you yourself do not desire." =96 Confucius "I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand." Confucius _______________________________________________ List address: puptcrit-AT-lists.driftline.org Admin interface: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/puptcrit-driftline.org Archives: http://www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005