Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 12:30:30 -0100 From: hbone <hbone-AT-optonline.net> Subject: Re: 9/11/01 Matthew Levy wrote:, > I have been thinking about Battaille's idea of general economy. Isn't it > interesting that a few days ago we were having a budget emergency and now no > dollar figure is too inconceivable to spend? People are so generous now > with their money and with their blood. I am not scoffing or sneering at > people who want to help. Far from it. I am just thinking that we could > have afforded to be more generous last month to our "enemies." When people > are desperate we do desperate things. The trillion the west will be > spending on cleanup, compensation, revenge and military buildup would have > been better spent on a new Marshall Plan-type operation. We purposefully > put Japan and Europe in a position to compete with us financially. We could > do that with other countries as well. As long as our policies make use of > other people's poverty, the world is going to be resentful. > mal Let me suggest that our "true" religion is money, that Washington D.C. is a Kabuki performance. That politicians and the media have persuaded "we the people", that our collective salvation lies in transferring tax monies to the wealthy, and that anything goes in international trade. That control of the U.S. two-party system and the mega-media by wealthy contributors, assures the serial incumbency of lawmakers who legislate higher subsidies and lower taxes for those who own and manage the nation's wealth. That U.S. democracy is defeated by discouraging half the citizens of voting age from participating. . As to the Marshall Plan and postwar Japan: Post-WWII, young Germans admired democracy because it "won wars". Afterwards they benefited from the presence of U.S. troops and a de-militarized economy, as well as benefiting from the Marshall Plan and its counterpart in Japan. Iin Germany today, workers who put in around 1400 hours per year get wages and benefits approximating those of U.S. workers who expend more than 1900 hours annually. The plight of post-war Europe or Japan was far different from that of Third World countries today. Europe and Japan had lost buildings and infrastructure, but their citizens had the education, training and a tradition of industrial accomplishment. Even so, it took many years to return to normal. In contrast, enormous populations in many Third World countries are rural, and depend on agriculture. They can learn to make shoes and clothing quickly, but it will take many years for them to develop the institutions and infrastructure sufficient for an acceptable level of national economic independence. To do so, they would need long term loans at low rates of interest, the investment device that made it possible for people of moderate income to own their own homes in the U.S. of the 1950's.. Meanwhile, the Transnational Agencies, IMF, WTO etc. whose original purpose was stablization and protection of international trade, seem to have become instruments of exploitation. They have allegedly assisted Industrial Nations' investors in Third World countries in destroying the value of currencies in those countries, permitting those investors to acquire their valuable resources at ridculously low prices. In the long run, constructive loan policies towards Third World nations could give them a high degree of self-sufficiency, reduce poverty, and add to world prosperity by creating additional customers and consumers. But many would argue that the U.S. should alleviate its own poverty, drug addiction, crime and homelessness as a first priority. Both possibilties seem unlikely today, 9/16/01 as our newest War is launched. New bills, transferring $billions to the wealthy, will soon be signed into law. regards, Hugh
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005